Most Presidents Ignore the Constitution - Fox's Judge Napolitano

Wall Street Journal ^ | Oct 29, 2008 | ANDREW P NAPOLITANO

[The Raven]

In a radio interview in 2001, then-Illinois State Sen. Barack Obama noted -- somewhat ruefully -- that the same Supreme Court that ordered political and educational equality in the 1960s and 1970s did not bring about economic equality as well. Although Mr. Obama said he could come up with arguments for the constitutionality of such action, the plain meaning of the Constitution quite obviously prohibits it.

Getty Images FDR tried to pack the Supreme Court. Mr. Obama is hardly alone in his expansive view of legitimate government. During the past month, Sen. John McCain (who, like Sen. Obama, voted in favor of the $700 billion bank bailout) has been advocating that $300 billion be spent to pay the monthly mortgage payments of those in danger of foreclosure. The federal government is legally powerless to do that, as well.

When Franklin Delano Roosevelt first proposed legislation that authorized the secretary of agriculture to engage in Soviet-style central planning -- a program so rigid that it regulated how much wheat a homeowner could grow for his own family's consumption -- he rejected arguments of unconstitutionality. He proclaimed that the Constitution was "quaint" and written in the "horse and buggy era," and predicted the public and the courts would agree with him.

[mrsmith]

Informative sometimes but never insightful.
A lawyer’s trade is to be persuasive. I’ve never seen him rise above that.

Here, for instance, he most glaringly pretends the 14th amendment- which is the mainspring of the federal government’s huge expansion of powers- doesn’t exist.

[waverna]

‘ONLY DEMOCRAT ones do...you IDIOT’

sarcasm?