pro-life/ moral absolutes ping for your lists
The court should not have done it AT all. Violation of the Tenth Amendment.
Wait a minute! There is either a right to privacy or there isn’t one. She really does beleive the court should legislate.
Sounds about like O’Conner’s decision that affirmative action was Constitutional, but only for the next twenty years, and then it would be unconstitutional.
Hey Ruth Buzzy, either something is addressed in the Constitution or it is not, that’s as the only analysis a judge needs to undertake. At least she’s admitting the court’s decision was a political, not legal decision.