Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nufsed
I am not an advocate of changing the contract laws or the age of majority to allow adults to have sex with children.

Ah then, you allow that the "pursuit of happiness" can rationally have boundaries and/or constraints?

The question then becomes, who should decide?
The perverts? or the vastly overwhelming normal majority?

That's what Prop 8 is intended to answer. We all (at least the adults) already know that boundaries and constraints are essential for a normal society to remain healthy.

166 posted on 10/28/2008 10:34:21 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961
The question is what is your justification for the restriction of the right? Protection of children is obvious.

Ah the pervert card. And you decided someone is a pervert and can thus not be married? Who let you decide that?

What right to you have to vote to restrict the right of other adult citizens? What other rights are you willing to subject to a vote or are we just keeping perverts in their place?

167 posted on 10/28/2008 10:37:38 PM PDT by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson