Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Land trusts must pass state muster under new easement rules
Rocky Mountain News ^ | 10/27/08 | Jerd Smith

Posted on 10/28/2008 2:26:09 PM PDT by girlangler

By Jerd Smith

Nonprofit land trusts charged with overseeing thousands of acres of scenic lands will have to be state certified next year in order to continue accepting lands, under a new review process.

Beginning Jan. 1, 2009, the Colorado Conservation Easement Oversight Commission will begin reviewing dozens of nonprofit trusts to ensure they are qualified to monitor lands and have the financial resources to defend the easements against development or misuse.

(Excerpt) Read more at rockymountainnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: conservation; easement; outdoors

1 posted on 10/28/2008 2:26:10 PM PDT by girlangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; george76; Flycatcher; Grammy; proud_yank; billhilly

I sure would like to know which non-profit trusts are under investigation wouldn’t you?

Could be interesting.


2 posted on 10/28/2008 2:28:40 PM PDT by girlangler (Fish Fear Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: girlangler

Sounds like a program that envited fraud by property owners and possible abuse by the enviro nutjob movement. At least it sounds like the state is trying to straighten it out.


3 posted on 10/28/2008 2:40:35 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: girlangler
The program was designed to offer private landowners lucrative state income tax credits in exchange for agreeing to permanently prohibit development on their lands by placing them under protective easements.

Wow. What a racket. I promise not to develop my two acres in Meadview any further. Can I have a tax credit now too?

In all seriousness, it doesn't surprise me one bit this is being abused. I just wish the government, even at the state level, would keep its collective nose out of our private property rights.

Thanks for the ping.

4 posted on 10/28/2008 2:49:16 PM PDT by Flycatcher (Strong copy for a strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: girlangler

Like most eco- government do-gooder programs it sounds nice but it is a magnet for scammers.

Their may be some exceptions, but...


5 posted on 10/28/2008 4:23:40 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Exceptions are as rare as honest politicians.


6 posted on 10/28/2008 5:01:29 PM PDT by B4Ranch (I'd rather have a VP that can gut a Moose, than a President that wants to gut our Second Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson