[saganite]

How is it that the Times obtained a copy and can suppress it? Since it’s a copy according to the article there must be other copies out there, not to mention the original.

[andy58-in-nh]

They refuse to say where they got it from, but there is certainly another out there somewhere (if only the original). It is beyond reprehensible for the Times to sit on this vital information, but we now know to expect as much from the liberal advocacy media.

I have to believe there's a way for someone to get their hands on this. Do we have any friends at the L.A. Times? Maybe at the Sports desk?