Skip to comments.
Will Obama Gut Defense? Capitol Hill Democrats want to target the Pentagon.
Wall Street Journal ^
| October 28, 2008
| Bret Stephens
Posted on 10/28/2008 7:21:36 AM PDT by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Obama thinks the purpose of government is to achieve "social justice" and "racial justice" through redistribution/reparations, and spending on traditional government functions such as national defense diverts money from his mission.
To: reaganaut1
To: reaganaut1
Capitol Hill Democrats want to target the Pentagon. Just like Bill Ayers and Al-Queda..............
3
posted on
10/28/2008 7:23:43 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(My wallet is made out of depleted you-owe-mium........)
To: reaganaut1
Capitol Hill Democrats want to target the Pentagon. ........................ And visa versa I’m sure.
4
posted on
10/28/2008 7:23:59 AM PDT
by
Bringbackthedraft
(PALIN/MCCAIN the real ticket!)
To: reaganaut1
5
posted on
10/28/2008 7:25:21 AM PDT
by
diverteach
(http://foolishpleasurestudio.com/eyewool/slap_hillary.html)
To: reaganaut1
Would General David Petraeus resign?
To: Rational Thought
If Obama is elected, Petraeus might be charged as a war criminal.
7
posted on
10/28/2008 7:28:17 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Raila Amollo Odinga - community organizer)
To: reaganaut1
So there's really no reason to fear that his recent call to cut defense spending by 25% is a harbinger of what to expect in an Obama administration. This is one reason why the Dem's want to reinstate the draft. With a draft, the pay and benefits can be slashed.
8
posted on
10/28/2008 7:28:40 AM PDT
by
fso301
To: reaganaut1
The DOD could likely do better with the money they get. It is government after all. However, to think that you can get 15-20% cuts is absurd.
9
posted on
10/28/2008 7:32:34 AM PDT
by
misterrob
(Obam-Spreading the Wealth To Those Who Didn't Earn It.)
To: reaganaut1
Joe Biden also cut an ad for the group that was even more emphatic: "I'll tell you what we cannot afford . . . a trillion-dollar commitment to 'Star Wars,' new nuclear weapons, a thousand-ship Navy, the F-22 Raptor." I hate to tell Joe this but I don't think anyone is talking about a trillion for star wars, a thousand ship navy, or new nuclear weapons. And the production run for the F-22 is about mid-way through.
To: reaganaut1
Don’t worry, we’ll save money by replacing all of that expensive military equipment and personnel with a suicide bomber brigade. Cheap and effective!
11
posted on
10/28/2008 7:35:41 AM PDT
by
thecabal
(I AM JOE)
To: reaganaut1
I want to know why Obama failed to register for selective service as required by Law?Anyone else but him and Bill would be in jail..
12
posted on
10/28/2008 7:39:18 AM PDT
by
PLD
To: reaganaut1
The Pentagon could do more efficient job of spending the money it is given. There is a certain amount of waste and fraud. But, if Obama’s cuts were to be anything like the Clinton cuts, they will cripple our military dangerously. This would necessitate a quick buildup in the event of a crisis, which sets up the exact circumstances that lead to even more widespread waste and fraud as opposed to a slower, more deliberate and systematic acquistions process. The only brake on this disfunctional cycle is the fact the military bases and programs are spread out across the country, and there are key Democrats in whose districts many civilian jobs related to the military are located (California comes to mind). It remains to be seen how well that brake would work in the worst-case scenario of a far-left government in both the executive and legislative branches.
13
posted on
10/28/2008 7:45:15 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
(They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours.)
To: reaganaut1
Democrats, doing the work terrorist can’t do.
14
posted on
10/28/2008 7:47:56 AM PDT
by
FreeAtlanta
(NOBAMA - it is for our future)
To: reaganaut1
I wonder what the socialists would do if the 80% of the military leadership resigned on Inauguration day, and 70% of the enlisted side stated stated that they would not be re-enlisting. Probably put ACORN in charge of the military I suppose.
15
posted on
10/28/2008 7:56:07 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
To: reaganaut1
16
posted on
10/28/2008 8:03:05 AM PDT
by
CASchack
To: reaganaut1
After hearing that idiot Joe Biden predict an major crisis and Colon Powell say it will start on Jan 21st, I’m beginning to wonder if he is going to announce at his coronation, that he is unilaterally disarming the United States and ordering our forces to stand down.
17
posted on
10/28/2008 8:14:32 AM PDT
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Don't let Soros and the muzzies buy the Presidency! HUSSEIN 0BAMA WILL NEVER BE MY PRESIDENT!!!!!)
To: reaganaut1
Gore reinvented government and saved the US taxpayer millions of dollars by cutting government employees...800,000 of them. The truth was that Gore’s cut was entirely from the military. Democrats hate the US.
To: CASchack
Right photo peanut farmer left photo peanut brain.
19
posted on
10/28/2008 8:42:43 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
(and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
To: reaganaut1
Why do you ask? The surrender monkeys do not want this country to exist; in its current form at least.
20
posted on
10/28/2008 8:53:32 AM PDT
by
BillT
(Socialism = Equal Poverty for ALL)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson