Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is a classic case of why law enforecement should not have *any* discretion about who gets a permit to carry.
1 posted on 10/27/2008 4:48:30 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

I would expect to see more and more cases like this occur, just because...

The scrutiny and mis-trust of elected officials and “some” Law Enforcement (I said some, few, not all) against those of us who actually do train, and regularly keep up with the law and the mindset behind your right to keep and bear arms in all aspects, and your self-defense will increase over the next 4 years...

That, along with a renewed vigor to make firearm ownership much more expensive will be a very real threat to our overall rights...

Jsut get used to it folks...The next battle is coming...Just know that the war will never end...

Just ask yourself this question...

What are you prepared to do about it, and what are you prepared to sacrifice?

I’m sure there are some people in this country that believe the people who got this country started, just sat around the fireplace at night and played video games...


2 posted on 10/27/2008 4:59:42 AM PDT by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain; Joe Brower

Never brandish, if at all possible. The law will screw you over.


3 posted on 10/27/2008 5:20:09 AM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
A vehicle, IMHO, can certainly be qualified as a weapon of deadly force. So, reaching for the one weapon you have in order to defend yourself should not be a crime.

I don't know of a single officer who would hesitate to do the same thing.

Firing in the air? Don't think that was terribly brilliant on his part. Should he loose his license? Maybe a suspension or a term of probation would have been the better judgement.

5 posted on 10/27/2008 5:55:26 AM PDT by Mobilemitter (We must learn to fin >-)> for ourselves.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Added Leatherman: “As sheriff, one of my responsibilities to the citizens of Noble County is to forward to the State Police Section any information that could bring into question a person’s privilege of being issued an unlimited license. I’m all for the Second Amendment. But the burden rests on the person who carries a gun to meet all the requirements.”

This is a dangerous attitude. What country does he suppose he is in?


6 posted on 10/27/2008 8:46:33 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Sarah Palin - High ideals on high heels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

A 9MM automatic pistol, eh?


10 posted on 10/27/2008 8:53:04 PM PDT by Skibane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson