Replies

To: pissant

Surricks had a conflict of interest.
THAT is why held on to the case.

3 posted on 10/26/2008 3:36:40 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)

To: Diogenesis

Then in appealing to SCOTUS, Berg better spell them out.

6 posted on 10/26/2008 3:38:59 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794