>>>The judge, like many, may consider obama’s election much more likely now and may have simply looked for the noble way to bow out.
His opinion was not a noble way to bow out. He chose sides
and made it clear that he is a tool by suggesting that a private citizen has no standing in who is elected POTUS.
The “noble” way to bow out would have been a simple admission of the truth. This belongs in a higher court based on the lack of evidence.
yeah, i figured i would get some replies over the use of ‘noble,’ which, if edit were available, I would have changed once I read the posted reply.
Should read “looked for the most pragmatic way to bow out.’”
more accurate?