Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae

>>>Surrick essentially Punted, he knew Berg would appeal it, likely he knew it was gonna go up over his head anyway, it would have been appealed by either side. To make a decision for Surrick was literally just an opportunity to have his decision over turned, something most judges will try to avoid.

Then why didn’t Surrick just grant dismissal when it was requested by the Obama camp????
Why demand Obama present his evidence only to just turn around after 30 days and dismiss it anyway???

In essance, Obama DEFIED the demands of a court, and STILL WON! Unbelievable!

Clearly Surrick is an activist, and just bought his Marxist buddy the precious time he needed.

When the left cries foul on timing, I hope Surrick is REMEMBERED!


221 posted on 10/25/2008 6:58:05 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Safrguns

“Then why didn’t Surrick just grant dismissal when it was requested by the Obama camp????
Why demand Obama present his evidence only to just turn around after 30 days and dismiss it anyway???”

Can you imagine the type of pressure surrick must have been under on this? Even worse since the economic crisis took off, he realizes he is ruling on the likely next president-elect.

To clarify, by pressure I don’t think in terms of name-calling and criticism in the press.


227 posted on 10/25/2008 7:06:51 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson