Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
What a beautiful speech from a woman with a beautiful heart!
But they can't help themselves, they will, and they will try to spin it negative.
They will FAIL and be burned.
Just a note on this subject. Sarah Palin’s decision to keep this child knowing he would have many challenges in life, is a testimony to her dedication to life itself. The Democrats position on children with special needs, well, they would kill it before or at birth. Which leads to the nest question: Would the Democrats eventually come up with a plan to kill old people who are on life support, medication, in wheel chairs, walkers, or need full time nurses also?
I don’t go along with the “fully funded” part.
Perhaps there should be private schools for these children, where the teachers have received special training.
Any cost in private schooling for special needs children should be tax deductible, however.
Anything the gubmint gets involved with goes South pretty fast. Just look at public education today. We rank 25th in the world for education standards.
In light of what could come to pass in a week and a half, sorry, but this area, important as it is, seems almost like a “boutique issue”.
In an earlier post, I spoke of what is the "elephant in the room" in this election. Yet, the subject is being muted and muffled by noise about the economy and less crucial issues.
It's time for life to become a battle cry in this last week of war for the future of American liberty! And it has been a declared war by the Left! It is the one area of real, recorded major difference between the candidates.
Let us not forget that Creator-endowed right to life and liberty is the foundation upon which this nation was founded.
If a nation devalues that concept, basing an individual's right to life and liberty on judicial fiat and a woman or girl's decision, then where is the security for liberty for any?
Yes, the elephant in the room in this election is the Radical Left's absolute determination that it, alone, will decide who sits on the Supreme Court of the United States! They talk about "change," they talk about war, they talk about everything else, but the "elephant" is the question of the unfettered right of a woman to destroy her unborn child. To the Left, this is a declared war on all opposition.
McCain & Palin do need to talk about the economy and Obama's "spread the wealth" philosophy, but for the sake of liberty for generations yet unborn, it is far more important that he clarify the importance of the life issue, and the threat to liberty if Obama carries out the Left's agenda. Soft pedaling this issue, as if it is just a personal preference, overlooks a far more significant principle.
"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."- Thomas Jefferson
"The world is different now. . . . And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forefathers fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God."- JFK, Inaugural 1961
Sarah, what a great idea you have for kids who are handicapped! Sarah, you’ll be the next VP!
Okay, I may have found something I disgree with Palin on. I don’t think the Federal government should be involved in ANY education issue.