So?....If Berg has no standing to sue Obama, how can a state assure that Obama is indeed qualified ( under the Constitution) to run? Is there a solution to the conundrum?
This case is an example of new juridicial waters never chartered before.
It should not be unreasonable for voting citizens to be given adequante assurance that the candidates on the ballot for the POTUS are constitutionally elligible.
I’m not sure that there are any past cases where a candidate has so many inconsistencies in his citizenship story, such as Obama, that a judge was compelled to force the candidate to produce his long-form original birth certificate. If there is, someone should cite these a precedence.
You would think that common sense would prevail. Apparantly, the judge seems to be stating that forcing Obama to produce his long form BC is somehow a violation of Obama’s civil rights, despite the fact that he is on the ballot for POTUS. All this despite the fact that Obama and his lawyers are fighting tooth and nail to avoid providing proof that he is constitutionally elligible.