[SeaHawkFan]

I believe the judge was saying he felt Berg’s challenge here did not have standing, that he felt it was frivolous and not worthy of discussion THAT BERG COULD EVEN DO THIS IN THIS WAY.

The judge has a duty to explain why Berg was wrong. You obviously don't have experience with corrupt judges who want to protect their allies. Judges routinely ignore the well pleaded arguments and citations of parties when they want a particular result and to hell with the law. I've had personal experience with all of this on numerous occasions.

[STE=Q]

“The judge has a duty to explain why Berg was wrong. You obviously don’t have experience with corrupt judges who want to protect their allies.”

Do you believe this Judge is really ‘in the tank’ for obama, and, if so, what would be sufficient evidence to file a complaint against the judge?

We really need to take the gloves off with these people...

OUR Constitution is at stake!

STE=Q