[guitarplayer1953]

Surrick ruled that Berg's attempts to use certain laws to gain standing to pursue his claim that Obama was not a natural-born citizen were "frivolous and not worthy of discussion."

On what conditions can a judge have this type of ruling? It seems that anything that is going to rock the proverbial boat such as suits against being taxed the ruling is alway that it is frivolous.

[browardchad]

"frivolous and not worthy of discussion."

On what conditions can a judge have this type of ruling?

When the suit contains nonsense such as reference to a "Canadian birth certificate" posted on line. The referenced cert was a joke, signed by Dudley Dooright of the Canadian Mounted Police. (A character from the old "Bullwinkle" cartoon series, for those too young to remember).

And that was just one of many "frivolous" references by Berg. If Berg wanted to be taken seriously, he had a stange way of going about it.