Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dajjal

There is NO standing in this case. There never was standing in this case. There never will be standing in this case. This case will never, ever go anywhere. This is an utter waste of our time to hitch a ride with a guy show sued GWB under RICO to “get him” for 9-11. *sigh* This lawsuit is frivolous and the facts are specious. SCOTUS would/will rule 9-0 the same way.


19 posted on 10/25/2008 2:14:07 AM PDT by Klepto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Klepto

There is NO standing in this case. There never was standing in this case. There never will be standing in this case. This case will never, ever go anywhere. This is an utter waste of our time to hitch a ride with a guy show sued GWB under RICO to “get him” for 9-11. *sigh* This lawsuit is frivolous and the facts are specious. SCOTUS would/will rule 9-0 the same way.
>>>>>>>>>>

Then what is the point of the “natural born” provision in the consitution if no one has the standing to hold a candidate to account?

By the way, there are now similar suits in several states.


25 posted on 10/25/2008 2:20:02 AM PDT by Nipfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto
the facts are specious

The one undeniable fact in this case is that BHO refuses to produce his birth certificate and is going to incredible lengths to make this issue go away. In any other election with any other candidate, the press would be screaming from the rooftops about this on a daily basis. But they won't go near this because they know it can only lead to something incriminating for BHO. At the very least this should taint his presidency forever with lingering questions about his legitimacy, just as GWB was unjustly tainted with the Florida fiasco, the difference of course being that suspicions of BHO are wholly justified, given the overall murkiness of his entire self-constructed legend.

27 posted on 10/25/2008 2:30:15 AM PDT by omniscient
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto

“There is NO standing in this case. There never was standing in this case. There never will be standing in this case.”

So then tell me, how does a little ole’ nobody of a citizen - like me - compel someone like Obama to verify his constitutional eligibility to run and/or serve as POTUS if not through the courts???

Voters have “no standing” in making sure candidates are constitutionally eligible to run for office???

When you have a clear case of a man (Obama) who has made a point of keeping virtually EVERYTHING about his background a secret - from medical records and college transcripts - to a valid birth certificate, how do you allow him to continue to stonewall the American people with his lies and secrecy? I thought the courts existed to allow for redress of grievances, and THIS is a pretty big one!

Were any of us seeking employment, we may have to do everything from provide official documentation of our eligibility to work in this country, to provide medical records suggesting we are of sound mind and body for the job, and even pee in a bottle, if needed!

Unfortunately, the same standard for employment in the private sector doesn’t seem to apply to public servants (if it did, Barney Frank and company NEVER could have gotten elected!)

The system is therefore rigged not to protect “we the people” but “they the politicians.” Personally, I find it sickening and makes me want to tread on a few flags, too, sometimes.

OK, so we get out and vote, and send this a**hole back to Kenya or wherever the hell else he might have come from. Fine with me. But don’t tell me we shouldn’t be outraged by this judge’s all too transparently political decision.

This judge is an embarassment.


28 posted on 10/25/2008 2:32:50 AM PDT by Stingray ("Stand for the truth or you'll fall for anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto

I’ve read a post of yours on another thread where you say you are an “old judge.” Perhaps you could answer this question for a layman.

Who or what is the controlling legal authority mandated to ensure that the Constitutional requirements for the office of POTUS are satisfied?


45 posted on 10/25/2008 3:36:55 AM PDT by Roccus (Someday it'll all make sense.............maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto
Klepto, this seems to be a very straight forward request. Is Obama qualified to be president? Why doesn't he produce his birth certificate?

Who and what is the controlling authority here and why aren't they asking for this easily obtained document?

58 posted on 10/25/2008 4:21:35 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto

Then how does Klepto propose to get the One to prove his citizenship?

There are several lawsuits against Secretaries of States to cause them to verify.

Any idea?


92 posted on 10/25/2008 6:17:47 AM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto

Welcome to free republic, maybe.


97 posted on 10/25/2008 6:24:38 AM PDT by Clint Lippo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto

Welcome to FR. Say hi to Assholerod for us.


162 posted on 10/25/2008 8:27:44 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto

Go back to DU.


199 posted on 10/25/2008 9:16:55 AM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto

“There is NO standing in this case. There never was standing in this case. There never will be standing in this case. This case will never, ever go anywhere. This is an utter waste of our time to hitch a ride with a guy show sued GWB under RICO to “get him” for 9-11. *sigh* This lawsuit is frivolous and the facts are specious. SCOTUS would/will rule 9-0 the same way.”

OK well you tell me how we force presidential candidates to prove that they qualify. Because as things are right now. They simply don’t have to. There is nothing right about that.


245 posted on 10/25/2008 10:09:20 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Klepto

Hi, Klepto.


286 posted on 10/25/2008 12:09:56 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson