[Brian S. Fitzgerald]

"If I'm interpreting this correctly, Judge Surrick’s opinion is that if Obama is in fact constitutionally ineligible to hold office of POTUS, then “harm” to voters can only become a reality ONCE HE IS IN OFFICE."

Where is the decision printed up? - the Judge may have suggested the Congress could be prompted to take up the issue at the certification of the Electoral College Results, Jan 6th, 2009.

[Brian S. Fitzgerald]

[motoman]

The excerpt was lifted from http://www.americasright.com/.

And to your question - Judge Surrick states:

“If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.”

Apparently, Judge Surrick does not believe that there are any laws that exist to establish procedures that protect voters from impostor citizens for running for President.