[EDINVA]

The Supreme Court is not going to take this case. Have you forgotten what happened with the Ohio GOP last week ?

“Standing” is critical to any law suit proceeding. I can’t imagine what “standing” would be required in this case, or who would have it.

[Hang'emAll]

“Standing” is critical to any law suit proceeding. I can’t imagine what “standing” would be required in this case, or who would have it....

Not a lawyer but I believe standing would be if someone could show loss or damage as a result of there being no BC.

So McCain and the RNC could sue if he lost the election.

[motoman]

Berg did not think he would prevail at this level. As expected, the dismissal had nothing to do with evidence of Obama’s birth details, but everything to do with “standing” and judicial procedure.

The glaring, and ongoing question, which is the real concern at the forefront in anyone's mind who is concerned with our constitution, is whether Obama is actually eligible. I do not think this open, and very legitimate question is going to go unanswered for Obama.

[motoman]

Below are supposedly all of the contacts for individuals spearheading lawsuits in various states (including Berg) regarding Obama’s Birth Certificate. Each is taking their own tact on this issue.

(HI) Andy Martin at email: AndyMart20@aol.com
(WA) Steve Marquis email: peoplesvoice@peoplespassions.org ; website: www.peoplespassion.org
(CA) David Archbold email darchbo1@gmail.com
(GA) Tom Terry email: kingdommatters@gmail.com
(PA) Philip Berg email: philjberg@obamacrimes.com ; website: www.obamacrimes.com
(NY) Dan Smith email: Dansmith1954@aol.com
(CT) Cort Wrotnowski email: Metaqubit@aol.com