Posted on 10/24/2008 5:26:30 PM PDT by Chet 99
Newsweek poll: 053, M41 (Newsweak's sample: 36% Dems, 36% Independents, 27% Republicans)
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
Stnad up for Chet!
I wouldn't be surprised to find out they don't really poll at all. If you're going to fudge the numbers anyway, why bother?
The newsroom?
These lies camouflaged as polls from the media need to be incentive to work even harder getting the message to voters to actually vote on the 4th.
Spreading the truth about these media lies needs to be mission number one.
Make sure everyone you know gets to the poling place and votes.
Expose the lie to all you know.
I get it...ha...to...the...haha
I disagree with that. And if they do tend to be embarrassed Dems, then they won’t go for the most far left Dem of them all. Makes no sense.
There are also a lot of moderates and conservatives who don’t want to be bothered. They just want to vote and not be continuously called during the political season at dinner time.
Thank God somebody got it! I thought I might’ve wasted my time!
Okay maybe I’m wrong, but my most important point is that they over sample Dems and that’s drives me nuts...but I’m used to it now...
According to Rasmussen’s internals for the prior week, 0 and McCain each have identical 87% support from their own parties, and almost exactly split with independents. The only reason for the 0 lead is the weighted party advantage.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that the GOP was the “3rd party” in Mass with the Independents being the “2nd party”.
Mass GOP’ers do those political demographics look right?
Based on the poll, and contrary to usual election history, it has the Democrats being ever slightly more Democratic than Republicans being Republican. But the difference is too small to matter. So, at a 39-35 split, Obama's lead would shrink to about seven points. If you want to make the Independents more realistically independent, subtract another 3 points and that gets you to 4 points overall.
Of course, I should add that in 2000, Dems had a 39-35 turnout advantage, but this was good for all of a 0.5% win for Gore in the national popular vote. And in 2004, only 89 percent of Democrats voted for Kerry (89-11) while 93% of Republicans voted for Bush (93-6).
LOL we are doing damn good if these are the internals. :)
Is this thread about Barney Frank? “polling their staff”
“Stand up CHET” “Everybody stand up for CHET”
Can you stand up CHET??
Ohhhh CHET... Everyone else stand up for CHET!! Let's give CHET a BIG hand!
These people are shameless.
Turn out the vote !!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.