Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

To my knowledge, there was nothing ‘mandatory’ about GWB’s proposal, which is another difference.


85 posted on 10/24/2008 4:33:24 PM PDT by Post Toasties (It's not a smear if it's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Post Toasties
Sure there was. It was deceptively simple. You continued to pay Social Security Tax. That's mandatory. You could elect to have some of it diverted to the stock market.

Still, it's the initial funding activity that's most critical in these plans.

Obamasama's Mad Bomber Associate cronies here propose creting an add on ~ that is, a higher tax level, and allowing that to go to US securities.

All same thing GI. Mandatory is mandatory. More is more. Frankly, I think it's common theft to attempt to graft previously voluntary 401(k) money into the Social Security tree. I will shortly be moving my money out of my IRAs to Canada, or maybe even Mexico (to dollar denominated accounts). How about you.

88 posted on 10/24/2008 4:39:45 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: Post Toasties

Sure there was. His proposal continued the existing “mandatory” taxation system.


103 posted on 10/25/2008 3:29:04 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson