“Then you should have no problem proving what you say is true.”
Any proof I provide will be dismissed by you regardless, as is your pattern with others.
I’ve given you the key words and you can find your own proof, if you’re so inclined.
In other words - I’m not playing that game with you :-)
And I'm not playing that game with you. :-)
But you brought it up. And "proof" shouldn't require that I be the one who accepts it. If it does, then it's not "proof." It's just a belief that you are trying to get me to accept.
If you really had "proof" -- or even a valid argument - what reason could there be for not showing the world? Why must I be the one who has to do the research to prove your case - or be considered "closed minded" because I won't do it?
Or are we now playing the game called "Who's best at not playing the game?"