Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll
No, no, I agree with you and believe that Article II of the US Constitution very clearly means that a President CANNOT have divided allegiences. That means NO DUAL CITIZENSHIPS IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

I just read Article II, but maybe I read the abridged version, because I didn't see anything in it that even touches on this issue. Can you quote the part of it that addresses dual citizenships?

For the record, I don't believe in dual citizenships for anyone, but we have to be careful that we don't let wishful thinking rule us.
172 posted on 10/23/2008 7:59:24 PM PDT by Mariebl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Mariebl

Please see the following for research on the subject you’ve mentioned. The gentleman who did this work is far more knowledgable than I.

His name is Judah Benjamin. The subject is Obama’s Divided Loyalties: His Eligability Problem, Part I & II;

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/divided-loyalties-pt-1/

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/divided-loyalties-pt-2/

Good luck! I hope this answers most of your questions. I’ve been working on Obama’s eligibility for about six months and have come to the conclusion that he is not a natural born citizen otherwise he would have made public his birth certificate and wouldn’t be hiding documents on which his birthplace had to be stated.


178 posted on 10/23/2008 8:38:49 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson