Posted on 10/23/2008 8:12:49 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
WE ARE THE MEDIA.
Free Republic, the blogs - now we need it on Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage/etc.
Move the story.
Bump it.
Email it [to friends, family, fellow conservatives, anyone].
Call Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage.
Call your local talk show hosts.
Call everyone.
Get it on the air.
And do the same for the "John Galt" credit card fraud story:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2113089/posts
Even if was “just” endorsed by the New Party, he would have had to gone through an extensive grilling in front of a New Party panel as well as sign a contract with them.
Oh, right, and they just photo-shopped him into that picture, eh?
Thank you very much for posting that.
Someone sure like to scribble.
HO-LEE-COW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here is what New Party candidates had to do:
“Alice Palmer especially has a long history with the African American left. Lou Pardo, a labor leader and New Party activist, is a strategist and organizer for Delgado.
Both Palmer and Delgado attended the forum and were thoroughly questioned by 70 or so New Party members. At the close, both publicly signed a “contract” with the New Party that was more formal and detailed than the agreement with Chandler. Two weeks later, the New Party formally endorsed them and is now mobilizing support.
This process is the best way the New Party can implement its “fusion” tactic in conditions where fusion candidates are not permitted by law. Only New York State allows for “fusion” or “cross- endorsement” by different parties for the same candidate on the same ballot. The process used to be common in U.S. elections during the last century, and was often used successfully by the Populist Party. That’s why the GOP and Democrats moved over the years to outlaw the tactic. The New Party today is fighting to bring it back. In the meantime, it is making use of the “contract” tactic just described.”
Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20010528042749/www.cofc.org/Publications/d12.htm
I have a feeling MSM is going to look really stupid, oops, look even stupider by the end of the week. We already know more about Joe the Plumber than we do about 0bama.
Uff-dah!
I’ve blogged it, and am e-mailing even as I type.
On the way to Hannity now.
“Oh, right, and they just photo-shopped him into that picture, eh?”
He admitted being endoresed by them- the caption next to the photo says that he was “endorsed” by the NP.
My personal take is that Jeremiah Wright’s sermons are what we should be spending our 527 money on. The whole New Party thing had a chance to catch fire a couple of weeks ago when it was released, which makes me think that the Hannities of the world have looked into it, not to mention the McCain campaign. The NRO “Corner” blog linked to this story 2 weeks ago, and I know for a fact that McCain campaign reads that blog. I was very excited about the New Party stuff 2 weeks ago, and when the McCain campaign said they would be breaking big news one morning I hoped that would be it. But it never went anywhere which makes me think Obama has plausiable deniability, such as through having formally run as a democrat.
Let’s remember- we’ve got tapes of Obama’s spiritual adviser of 20 years damning America. A 527 group should run that tape continuously.
If only Fox News would stay on it 24/7! At least O’Reilly and Hannity.
Obama Socialism 101
Something to share with your children.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2J5-BA0kk4
Rod,
Don’t know if you sent it to Mark, but am pinging him.
It seems to me everyone is missing the key point with respect to the New Party. It's own mission statement establishes that the New Party had a revolutionary purpose. Accusing Obama of being a socialist provokes only yawns from most swing voters. Many of them are too ignorant to be shocked by the prospect of a socialist in the oval office. A revolutionary is a different kettle of fish entirely, even a “democratic” revolutionary. (After all, both the Bolsheviks and the Nazis exploited democracy to further their revolutionary goals).
Republicans should be using Ayers, Wright, Klonsky, Rashidi and ACORN together with the New Party affiliation to hammer the point that Obama is a socialist revolutionary. They need to repeat like a mantra that Obama uses “change” as code for a socialist revolution which would impoverish our country and weaken it, perhaps fatally. His current proposals are irrelevant because they are merely a smoke screen to cover the revolutionary purpose that has animated his entire career.
That's what Republicans need to say, but they can't because they deliberately nominated a leader without enough understanding of ideology to grasp this argument, let alone make it. Whatever McCain can't say is electorally irrelevant. As a result, the New Party won't be any more decisive than Ayers has been.
Republicans truly are the stupid party.
ping
Done. Rush and Bill O'Blowhard too. Hannity next.
Bump
I’ve been bombarding Rush etc for over a week about this stuff. The good news is that Rush is going to have an interview on that he did with Stanley Kurtz and Kurtz is on this New Party stuff!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.