[kevkrom]

Andy Martin has no standing to ask the Hawai’i Supreme Court anything of the sort — it’s a publicity stunt and will get dismissed in a blink of an eye.

Berg’s suit is similarly flawed, except that we was clever enough to have pointed out that he is potentially injured as a victim of a fraud perpetrated by the DNC.

[Loyalist]

These sorts of frivolous and vexatious lawsuits get filed against public officials all the time, and almost always get tossed very quickly for one reason or another.

If Andy Martin’s case was plainly and obviously frivolous, the DNC could simply have retained a Honolulu lawyer to file a motion to dismiss with prejudice.

Yet here comes Obama himself with DNC lawyers in tow.

Andy Martin may be a nut. But even a nut can find something serious.

[who_would_fardels_bear]

The defintion of "has standing" is certainly flawed if it turns out that anyone can't sue Obama. We are all American citizens that will potentially be led by an ineligible person.

We all have standing. If not, then the definition of "standing" has to change.