Actually, his argument states that in 1961, she did not meet the requirements. I have been unable to verify this, but the courts should hear all the available evidence and straighten it out there.
After all, it's what the Courts are there for.
Obama could easily clear this up. He doesn't and hasn't.
Sometimes, when there is smoke, there is indeed fire. It'd be a good idea to check wouldn't it?
People are free to do whatever they wish. But this isn't 'just checking'. This comes across as abusing the court system in an effort to stop Obama from getting elected. This will not get any traction in the courts.
I don't want Obama elected either, but it seems that it would be better to attack him on the issues instead of doing things that only make one look like a lunatic.