It also implies that a citizen has no standing to demand that elections be conducted according to the US Constitution unless that citizen can somehow prove quantifiable personal damage if the Constitution is violated?
Are we in Catch-22 here?
The FEC is against vetting a candidate for President of the USA. wtf
>It also implies that a citizen has no standing to demand that elections be conducted according to the US Constitution unless that citizen can somehow prove quantifiable personal damage if the Constitution is violated?
Of course, if the average citizen cannot ask questions of the movings of politicians things will run so much smoother for the government.
>Are we in Catch-22 here?
Yes. But I’ll bet the Judiciary doesn’t see it that way.
>The FEC is against vetting a candidate for President of the USA. wtf?
Yep! Because, if anything, it would show them as incompetent.