Say it ain't so.
To: crusty old prospector
If we ever get global cooling, it will not be a good thing.
And it will come, as weather cycles are naturally occuring things.
To: crusty old prospector
3 posted on
10/22/2008 8:26:33 AM PDT by
xcamel
(Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
To: crusty old prospector; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; proud_yank; ...
To: crusty old prospector
Maybe the best strategy is to simply say, “Hey, Kyoto worked! Good job, and thanks Europe, Canada and Australia!”
Now that you fixed the planet’s temperature, we can get back to normal.
They get the props that they want, we all get back to letting production and commerce take place.
7 posted on
10/22/2008 8:28:57 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("[Gov. Sarah Palin] is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger." -- Gloria Steinem)
To: crusty old prospector
That was a great read!!! Thanks for posting it.
9 posted on
10/22/2008 8:33:02 AM PDT by
NRG1973
To: crusty old prospector
Thank you for posting this. I had not seen it. I do not view re-posting as the great sin some do here on FR. And, you are correct, the search engine is rather weak.
11 posted on
10/22/2008 8:35:01 AM PDT by
Blennos
(High Point, NC)
To: crusty old prospector
Joe Biden is deeply saddened. (Vague reference to Biden’s statement on global warming made during the VP debate.)
13 posted on
10/22/2008 8:39:18 AM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Ping to you and the globaloney warming list.
15 posted on
10/22/2008 8:44:00 AM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: crusty old prospector
Timing is everything:
17 posted on
10/22/2008 8:47:44 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
(Put Palin in the White House. Send McCain to Sun City, AZ)
To: crusty old prospector
Good article, well put together. The comments are worth reading, too.
18 posted on
10/22/2008 8:49:17 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: crusty old prospector
Hasn’t been any global warming since’98. There is absolutely no credible scientific evidence to support AGW. It is all based on computer models programmed to show a steady increase in global temperature because of human activity which will lead to a global catastrophe. there is a pile of scientific data to show that this is all a hoax. The Greens/socialists really want the destruction of capitalism, and this is one of their most important venues. they will not give up easily.
21 posted on
10/22/2008 9:09:10 AM PDT by
capn dino
(socialism is communism lite)
To: crusty old prospector; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
28 posted on
10/23/2008 6:42:02 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Obamao for President! I won't settle for the lesser evil any longer!)
To: valkyry1; tpanther; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; Arthur Wildfire! March; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; ...
Actually, it was more like a string of guest columns and long letters to the editor since it is hard for skeptical scientists to get published in the cabal of climate journals now controlled by the Great Sanhedrin of the environmental movement. Imagine that.
How objective of them.
Is that anything like skeptical scientists not being able to get published in evo journals, I wonder?
29 posted on
10/23/2008 6:56:51 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: crusty old prospector
37 posted on
11/28/2008 10:30:22 PM PST by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
