Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chet 99; tatown; jwalsh07; CatOwner; Sam Spade

For what it’s worth, I think it is a bit misleading for pollsters to insist on including leaners with a candidate rather than “undecided.” Or at least to show one set of numbers without showing the other so that we can get a sense of the volatility of the numbers.


95 posted on 10/22/2008 11:15:04 AM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: kesg

Agreed. I think it is in the “likely” and “leaners” that you will find those voters subject to the Bradley Effect.


97 posted on 10/22/2008 11:19:16 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: kesg

Yeah, to me it looks like a 44-41 race which is almost exactly the way AP sees it today and pretty close to TIPP. Lots of not sures out there. And nobody knows which way they will tip in the end.


98 posted on 10/22/2008 11:22:27 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (MSM Lied, Journalism Died. RIP 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: kesg

I agree with you.


99 posted on 10/22/2008 11:27:59 AM PDT by tatown (RINO's have destroyed the Republican party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson