Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antceecee

I’m not really defending it. We shouldn’t have needed it, just like we shouldn’t have needed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The fact that we did represents a huge failure ... not something to really celebrate.

The important thing is that those days are now gone. The question now is not to dwell on those past things but how do we move forward. Palin is clearly pandering by looking backward at Title IX with rosy glasses, but she’s in this to WIN. I can appreciate that.


44 posted on 10/21/2008 8:11:59 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne
Palin is clearly pandering by looking backward at Title IX with rosy glasses, but she’s in this to WIN.

Ah, I see. The feminist interpretation is that only a man wins a hollow victory if he gains the world at the price of his own soul. Women get a pass.

48 posted on 10/21/2008 8:21:45 PM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson