Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigh4u2

To be proper, the correct race would have been “Negro”, especially at that time. However, given the diversity of ethnic backgrounds here in Hawaii, who knows what the usual procedure in 1961 was. I am sure that there were plenty of hapa-haoles having children at that time, so how would a half-caucasian, half-japanese parent usually be described?

Also, if Obama’s father was part Arab, as rumored(?), wouldn’t “African” have been more appropriate? After all, North Africans are Arabs or some similar ethnicity.

In any case, the use of “African” to describe his father still seems strange.


132 posted on 10/21/2008 11:12:50 AM PDT by KAUAIBOUND (Hawaii - paradise infested with left-wing cockroaches and centipedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: KAUAIBOUND

North Africans are not Arabs. If they are not black they are mixed from colonization.


137 posted on 10/21/2008 11:26:07 AM PDT by teacherbarbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: KAUAIBOUND

In the 60’s ‘black’ or ‘negro’ would have been the most widely used description for race.

No one would put ‘American’ as ‘Race’ for an American citizen anymore than they would put ‘African’ for a citizen of an African country.

Obama’s father being from Africa doesn’t mean he is ‘African’.

His ‘race’ would probably depend upon which part of Africa he was from.

If he came from an Arab nation, then ‘Arab’ would probably be the correct word.

What ‘race’ is a person from Kenya?

Sure isn’t ‘African’.

“In any case, the use of “African” to describe his father still seems strange.”

I agree.


140 posted on 10/21/2008 11:28:09 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson