I'm afraid you're sadly misinformed. Berg issued a press release stating that because there had been no response to the requests for admissions, they were deemed admitted.
That is not so. It is only Berg saying it is so, and Berg has no authority whatsoever. He is merely a vexatious litigant with a website who has apparently suckered a bunch of people here in.
As I've mentioned above, Obama has moved for a protective order staying the requirement to respond to the requests for admissions (RFAs) until the court has ruled on the pending motion to dismiss. No court will deem RFAs admitted under such circumstances.
OK, so he (Berg) is an uncouth skeptic - nutbag, in your terms.
The timing of his demands for release of the documents (discovery) is so short (Sept 15 until Nov 3 essentially) that he HAD to do that, because the democrats were going to deliberately stall, delay, obscure and ignore this case.
After all, if they had ANY document of ANY kind showing he was wrong, they would have shown it on Sept 16.
Even if it was only a cab fare to the hospital on the date of the birth, a parking recepit, a hospital bill, and doctor’s exam, doctor’s bill, a diaper bill - for God’s sake - ANYWHERE near the time of delivery would have been produced.
An insurance bill or insurance policy SHOWING the date of birth? Baby clothes? Did anybody buy a crib or bassinet BEFORE his family immigrated to HI?