Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: King of Florida

But if the restraining/delaying/whatever order is not _granted_, which apparently it wasn’t, isn’t the point moot and today is BHO’s last day to either put up or [be] shut up? Just _asking_ for restraint/delay/dismissal isn’t grounds for not meeting an otherwise effective deadline.


196 posted on 10/21/2008 8:04:48 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
But if the restraining/delaying/whatever order is not _granted_, which apparently it wasn’t, isn’t the point moot and today is BHO’s last day to either put up or [be] shut up? Just _asking_ for restraint/delay/dismissal isn’t grounds for not meeting an otherwise effective deadline.

The motion for protective order hasn't been ruled on yet (at this rate, the court may just go ahead and grant the motion to dismiss, which would render the RFAs moot). A pending motion for a protective order is certainly grounds for not responding to discovery.

308 posted on 10/21/2008 11:22:27 AM PDT by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson