My guess is that Obama has been summoned by the supreme court to explain why they shouldn’t release the birth certificate information.
If I were one of the justices, thats the first thing I would be asking for prior to judgement. Are they going to take a serious look at this? Or is the supreme court in Hawaii going to rule in Obama’s favor like SCOTUS ruled for the Ohio secretary of state?
The big question is what is the history of this supreme court in the aloha state? Liberal leanings? conservative?
I’d say dont hold your breath.
ROFLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Election officials do have authority to block a presidential candidate from appearing on the November ballot, if that candidate is not eligible under the Constitution. The California Supreme Court in 1968 upheld Secretary of State Frank Jordan's keeping Eldridge Cleaver off the ballot as the Peace & Freedom Party candidate for president because he wasn't yet age 35. But the Secretary of State acknowledged that the electors themselves had a right to run, so the Nov. 1968 California ballot had a blank for president under the Peace & Freedom label, but carried the name of the vice-presidential candidate, Peggy Terry, since she was eligible. That slate of electors got 27,707 votes."