Posted on 10/20/2008 6:43:05 AM PDT by shortstop
There are two types of people in the world.
Those who think Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama because he’s black, and those who believe that anyone who thinks that is a racist. One type is forced by modern political correctness into silence, and the other type is by the same means emboldened in its vigilant desire to denounce.
The numbers of each probably exceed a hundred million.
Personally, I believe racial solidarity was a factor, probably the deciding factor, in Colin Powell’s endorsement. The only other explanation is that, in the eighth decade of his life, Colin Powell has completely changed political philosophies and lost the ability to gauge political reality.
No disrespect intended, Colin Powell has been a prominent American and a career military man, but his stated reasons for backing Barack Obama don’t make sense.
Here are some examples.
He said yesterday on “Meet The Press” that the Republican Party could not be entrusted with the next two Supreme Court nominations. He said that the appointment of more conservatives to the court would be bad for the country.
That is a straw man argument that, if it is sincere, requires us to believe that Colin Powell knows nothing of John McCain’s political record of even which party controls the U.S. Senate. John McCain has been, over the last 25 years, less politically conservative than Colin Powell. John McCain would appoint moderates to the Supreme Court and the rest of the federal judiciary, but he would not appoint conservatives.
And at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter who John McCain appoints – the Harry Reid Senate, with an expected Democratic supermajority, is going to hold all the cards. Who gets on the Supreme Court for at least the next two years will be determined by the Democratic Senate, not by a possible Republican White House.
And Colin Powell knows that.
So that reason is disingenuous.
And others seem similarly unconvincing. Look at his statement on TV: “I come to the conclusion that because of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities — and you have to take that into account — as well as his substance — he has both style and substance, he has met the standard of being a successful president, being an exceptional president.”
Let’s take that in order. First, “his ability to inspire.”
Actually, Barack Obama’s “ability to inspire” extends to less than half the people in the country. In fact, his support among the public is no higher than that generated by Al Gore or John Kerry when they ran for president. So far, Barack Obama’s support across the country – in spite of a staggering campaign budget and more ads than anyone has ever seen before – is essentially what it has been for any Democratic presidential candidate of the last generation.
Put another way, Barack Obama has yet to inspire as many people – as a percentage of the population – as Jimmy Carter did against Gerald Ford in 1976. And he has yet to surpass the percentage “inspired” by Bill Clinton, Al Gore or John Kerry.
Next absurdity: “because of the inclusive nature of his campaign.”
Inclusive of whom? Is that the dictionary “inclusive,” as in lots of different types of people, or the politically correct “inclusive,” as in non-white? Actually, neither is truly accurate. Barack Obama’s campaign – naturally – is composed of the traditional Democratic coalition. And at its senior levels it may be, compared to Al Gore and John Kerry, less racially diverse, by which I mean more senior people seem to be white.
Next line: “because he is reaching out all across America.” That’s meaningless. Not since Benjamin Harrison campaigned from his front porch has a presidential candidate from either party done anything other than “reach out all across America.”
Next line: “because of who he is.” That’s pretty subjective, but “who he is” includes being the most liberal and least experienced major-party presidential candidate anyone can think of.
Then Colin Powell praised Barack Obama’s abilities as a speaker, which many people would agree with.
Colin Powell was asked about the perception some would have that he endorsement was about race.
He responded, “If I had only had that in mind, I could have done this six, eight, 10 months ago. I really have been going back and forth between somebody I have the highest respect and regard for, John McCain, and somebody I was getting to know, Barack Obama. And it was only in the last couple of months that I settled on this."
That’s not a satisfying answer. The truth is that, if you decide you support a candidate – for whatever reason – you announce your endorsement at the time it will do them the most good. And right now, just two weeks before the election, when Barack Obama is up but not putting it away, is when a big-name endorsement will do him the most good. Timing is no reflection of reason, when it comes to endorsements. Colin Powell’s response doesn’t really make sense.
And neither does his endorsement.
Granted, anyone can vote for anyone for any reason they choose, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Voting – and endorsing – are completely private and personal rights, and nobody owes anybody an explanation for anything.
But, if you take race out of it, Colin Powell’s endorsement seems to be a departure from a lifetime’s choices and allegiances. Colin Powell has been a Republican insider since the days of Richard Nixon, for whom he worked. That contact proved very valuable to his military career as he hopscotched his seniors to take assignments and promotions.
He was Ronald Reagan’s national security advisor. George Bush the elder made him the youngest chairman of the joint chiefs, and the only one not to have attended West Point or Annapolis. George Bush the younger made him secretary of state.
At every turn of his career, Colin Powell has implemented and supported the conservative policies of his Republican patrons. He was, in fact, the man who assured the world in testimony before the United Nations that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. When Barack Obama claims that America was “lied into” the war in Iraq, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that he believes Colin Powell is a liar, as it was Colin Powell who assured the world and the American people that Iraqi weapons of mass destruction made the war necessary.
Further, the surge which Barack Obama opposed is an application of the so-called Powell Doctrine – the belief held by every man who served in Vietnam, that if you’re going to fight, you go in with the deck stacked in your favor and you flatten your enemy, no holds barred.
With all respect to Colin Powell, who is a noteworthy and inspiring American, the philosophy and associates of Barack Obama are a dramatic departure from what and who Colin Powell has associated himself for his entire adult life. If a man sincerely supported Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, he cannot sincerely support Barack Obama. Without regard to which side of the equation you admire or support, the two sides are ultimately irreconcilable. They just stand for very different things.
If it wasn’t race that tipped Colin Powell to Barack Obama, it’s hard to figure out what else it could have been. Unless the general has had a late-life change of philosophy – or he spent a career supporting policies and politicians he didn’t really believe in – his support of Barack Obama doesn’t make sense. He is a career military man who personally served in the staffs of four conservative Republican presidents and benefited tremendously from them.
Colin Powell can support anybody he wants. That’s his right. Just as it’s our right to try to figure out why.
A late life change of philosophy?? No thanks. Powell served those who could—and did—serve him...with promotions based upon loyalty and race. Nothing more. Now that he can go no further, Powell becomes the liberal black he has always been, but which would have stood in the way of his career had it been made known. Powell was and is a seeker of advantage, not unlike Obama. And as with the Messiah, integrity is a very changeable comodity.
“Yes, he has claimed to be a Republican,...”
Powell is a man who could have been the first black President. He had reasonably enthusiastic support from the Republican party in 2000 but he refused to run.
Looking back I think Powell was just an opportunist who associated himself with the Republicans as a tool to advance his career. They gave him opportunities that the RAT party couldn’t or wouldn’t. Now he betrays them. What a creep.
1. Powell’s endorsement was secured by the promise of a Cabinet post.
2. Powell has for some time had a chip on his shoulder against the Republican Party and its base.
3. Powell introduced the subject of race into the discussion. That suggests to this observer that race played a factor in his decision.
Payback is a bitch. Wonder how Rumsfeld will be voting?
My point is that Jamacia was a slave colony for a few centuries, complete with “breaking camps”. Also, the model was to work a large number of the slaves to death and replace, far worse than in the (American) colonies.
MMMM... sugar, what would YOU do for it?
OMG! That’s exactly what I thought!!
You can't take race out if it. If you did, there would be a) no endorsement by Powell and b) no one who cares.
Powell has proven himself to be nothing more than a tool for the same agenda-driven libs who once branded him Uncle Tom.
And, I want to hear from them...ALL of them. What I am - dare I say it? - offended by is the portrayal of race (and even gender) in this election cycle.
The ‘Rats and the media (but I repeat myself) have reduced everything in the race to its lowest, most common of denominators. It’s disgusting.
He can’t take race out of it, but I could.
Race isn’t an issue unless your someone supporting a Democrat.
Don’t call me sugar. :)
Colin Powells endoresment?....No help. It’s night and day for all but the undecided brain dead on the fence....
That was funny, thanks!
:)
“Powell’s endorsement was secured by the promise of a Cabinet post.”
The man was Chairman of the Joint chiefs of staff and Sec of State. What cabinet position would interest him and not be seen as a step down?
Powell become prominent in the public eye riding General Schwarzkopf's success, while simultaneously insuring the success wouldn't last.
Sec State (left because of policy disagreements with Bush 43)
Sec Def
Powell is either incredibly ignorant of who Obama is —in which case Powell is stupid for endorsing without finding out
OR he knows who Obama is —in which case Powell is Like Benedict Arnold
I wonder how much influence his wife had on his decision
What’s your thought on the Colin endorsement?
The dagger into the back.
I am a pessimist ,,,,, a pessimist is an optimist with experience .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.