Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teacherbarbie
They need an A-lister with today's movie economics model.

When the cost of distribution, along with other fixed costs of movie making, drops as the digital technology takes hold; the break-even point can be reached with a much smaller audience. The A-listers won't be needed to draw block-buster sized audiences. Digital distribution, combined with cutting star salaries to a third, would cut $30 million or more from the cost of producing a movie. That would allow another $15 or $20 million to be trimmed from the promotions budget. The average cost of “A” movies could easily be cut in half.

Another result of lower production and distribution costs will likely be a greater number of movies being made. Just as there are many more TV shows now, than in the days of the network oligopolies — the major studios will lose their oligopolistic powers over movie making. Who knows, there might even be some movies targeted toward a FR audience.

30 posted on 10/19/2008 2:57:12 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

What MALE is an A-List star anymore??

Who is this generations John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, etc.?

Sissified males like George Clooney? Matt Damon? Leonardo DiCaprio?

They’re phasing out the last crop of macho males like Arnold, Mel Gibson, Stallone, etc. all “men” now must be simpering wussies to appear on screen.


31 posted on 10/19/2008 3:03:25 PM PDT by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson