Just sent this to CNN, MSMBC and ABC:
Sarah Palin bought a house she couldn’t afford for 300K under asking price with the aid of a convicted Syrian born felon whose wife bought the vacant lot next door from same buyer for what appraiser now claims was at least 125K above value. Appraiser claims he was fired from the bank for objecting to this bogus apparisal which directly financially benefited Palin. Why have you reported on this story?!!! Oh sorry, I made a typo, insert Obama for Palin. Never mind. Now I know.
I want to sell my property and the adjoining lot. I don't want to hassle with selling the parcels separately. A buyer comes (bambi) and he can only afford my house at a reduced price, but he has a really good friend (Retzko) who will buy the adjoining lot for more than it's worth so I'm going to get the money I want and have both properties sold.
Now after the properties close this really good friend (Retzko) who has already paid too much for the lot, sells his new best buddy (bambi) 10' of the lot that's next to bambi's new house. In doing this he increases the value of bambi's house and reduces the value of the remaining land he owns.
Why would anyone do this if they weren't receiving something of equal or greater value somewhere else?