Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker
If a doctor advises a patient to abort on the basis of a suspicion of Downs that has not been genetically confirmed, and the fetus then turns out not to have had Downs (which is VERY easily confirmed post-abortion), that doctor will be sued, the doctor’s insurer won’t even bother going to court and will settle out of court for a huge sum, and the doctor will never be able to get malpractice insurance again, and will thus never be able to practice medicine in the US again.

Unless, of course, the patient has the same feelings that you believe happened in this case, which is that they really didn't want the child in the first place. Doc certainly wouldn't be much at risk if he's given someone justification for ridding themselves of an unwanted child, would he?

64 posted on 10/17/2008 11:50:54 AM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Shethink13

In this country, nobody needs “justification” if they want to have an abortion. If you’re pregnant and don’t want to carry to term, you go have an abortion. If a woman is flaky enough to wait for some half-baked undefinitive “justification” like a doctor saying her fetus “might” have Downs, before proceeding with an abortion she wanted anyway, she’s also flaky enough to change her mind after the fact. Especially when she realizes she’s already rid of the baby she didn’t want anyway, and now has guaranteed route to collecting a few million dollars by suing the doctor. And you can be sure that ob/gyns and their malpractice insurers know this.


65 posted on 10/17/2008 11:57:59 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson