Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.F. to return $5.2 million in federal funds
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 10/17/8 | Jaxon Van Derbeken

Posted on 10/17/2008 7:45:31 AM PDT by SmithL

San Francisco officials have agreed to pay back $5.2 million in federal grant money the city now admits it was not entitled to under a U.S. program to compensate local law enforcement for fighting border crime.

The U.S. Justice Department audited its Southwest Border Prosecution Initiative grant program last year and concluded that San Francisco - through a private consultant - had applied for money it was not entitled to claim for prosecuting cases for federal authorities and incarcerating defendants.

Rather than basing its claims on specific cases that federal officials referred for local prosecution, as required by the program guidelines, the city and its consultant determined that the city should be paid for 30 percent of all drug-related prosecutions.

Under that formula, San Francisco received reimbursement for 2,300 cases. The city agreed this week that it was entitled to money for only about 5 percent of that total.

The city got $3.7 million in fiscal 2006 alone under the program, more than any other local jurisdiction in the country.

With the audit findings in hand, U.S. Attorney Joseph Russoniello sent a letter to the city in February demanding the $5.7 million that the city received from 2004 to 2007.

After initially disputing the audit's findings, the city agreed in February to pay $2.7 million immediately and sought more time to come up with a list of cases that federal authorities had actually referred to San Francisco agencies.

Federal officials reviewed that list and determined that only 126 cases were valid under program guidelines. That meant San Francisco was entitled to just $522,000 out of the $5.7 million it got in grants.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: baghdadbythebay; cultureofcorruption; democrats; elections; sanctuaryfrancisco; sanfranciscovalues; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Sanctuary Francisco
1 posted on 10/17/2008 7:45:31 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Well, Gavin Newsom is more concerned with homosexual marriage than the state of his own marriage. He’s more concerned with having affairs with other people’s wives than taking care of business. The people of SF are going to vote on Nov. 4th whether to name a sewage treatment plant the George W. Bush sewage treatment plant. And we know about how SF is a sanctuary city. The priorities of the people of SF and their city gov’t are out of whack. Glad to see they got caught on this one.


2 posted on 10/17/2008 7:48:32 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“It’s going back!

Whether you like it or not!”


3 posted on 10/17/2008 7:59:52 AM PDT by Califreak (As seen on TV: S.A.R.A.H!-Sane Americans Are Against Hussein-Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
S.F. deficit grows to projected $338 million

Saturday, March 22, 2008

(03-21) 17:29 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- San Francisco city officials have expected to be short hundreds of millions of dollars for next year's budget, but they will have to cut even more, according to a report released Friday by three City Hall budgeting offices.

More at link
4 posted on 10/17/2008 9:43:59 AM PDT by Islander7 (This Atlas is shrugging!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson