“It is not trustworthy because it is not scientific.”
And yet professor obvious — I present to you as exhibits “A” and “B” polling data from October in both the 2000 and 2004 campaigns (both of the candidates on the left were white) — notice the similarities between the democrats being farther ahead in the polls at the same time during those two campaigns just as the candidate on left is in the 2008 election...odd, the data reflects similar results all in favor of the candidate on the left...”in all three campaign’s.”
Hhhhhhuuuuummmm, gee professor, one might actually deduct from this polling data — “that your “F’n” polls are BS and they are skewed in favor the left to try and get the folks on the right to stay home.”
But, I digress — my conclusion is not scientific — my conclusion is actually based on reality.
I seem to recall a general fear of REagan losing. Were’t the polls very close just before election?
SAme it seems with Kerry and Gore.
Gore in fact, yielded more votes nationally.
I think the closer the polls get just before election, it rallies conservatives.
To be fair to the pollsters, patriotic Americans (i.e., those voting against Obama's socialism) are to blame also. In general, we have real lives. In general, we are doing things rather than hoping for someone to call and listen to us on the phone. In general, we hang up on telemarketers, pollsters, and everyone else we don't know because we actually accomplish things with our time, we have kids to raise, and we don't want to be bothered with these silly polls. It's our own behavior as much as liberal bias that leads to the inaccurate results.