[mojito]

What a terrific response.

The WSJ didn’t print it because it was so much better than the original.

[iopscusa]

Did the WSJ not print GipperGal’s terrific response to Noonan? I was a long time subscriber to WSJ until they finally became insufferable a couple of years ago. I frequently wrote responses and would rarely get them posted. I discovered that the WSJ had several ‘Pet Posters’ that were reliably supportive of the main article or the Left of Center view point to the published article. I wrote the WSJ several times to call them on the BS posters but of course was ignored...Peggy Noonan’s disdain for True Conservatism is part & parcel of what the WSJ editorial board consist of, aka elitist...remember their Open Border and anti-anti-Amnesty stance?
The Fox News is just a bit better than the WSJ but Conservative America does not have much if any MSM support and we need to realize that.