Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
As I understand it, production of ethanol apparently produces prodigious amounts of carbon dioxide in itself (land clearing, manufacture, and use). If taxing fossil fuels becomes a viable option in the future, I think ethanol and other biofuels should be added to the list.

Based on a digested compendium of what I've read, it's fairly clear that corn ethanol doesn't gain much in CO2 "savings". Biomass and cellulosic ethanol should, if the digestion process can become large-scale. So I think it depends on the source.

But large-scale production from algal ponds might be the most efficient.

141 posted on 10/17/2008 2:29:45 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: cogitator
But large-scale production from algal ponds might be the most efficient.

You could use captured CO2 from power plant emissions to force-feed the algae. As I understand it, there is already at least one prototype CO2 scrubber out there. :-)

143 posted on 10/17/2008 6:04:07 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Communism's only killed 100 million people; let's try it again! Obamao for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson