Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airport Admits 'strip search' body scanners WILL show people naked
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | 10/16/2008 | Richard Shears

Posted on 10/15/2008 10:22:20 PM PDT by dcwusmc

New 'strip search' full body scanners being trialled in Australia will show people's private parts, officials have admitted.

But to spare their blushes, the faces of passengers will be blurred.

Domestic travellers leaving Melbourne airport over the next six weeks will be asked to test the new security scanners that can see through clothing.

The X-ray backscatter body scanner has been described by critics as a "virtual strip search."

The scanner is similar to one that was trialled at Paddington station in London in 2006 in direct response to the tube bombings in July 2005.

Similar systems have also been tested at Gatwick airport.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Does ANYONE feel more secure now? I sent this response to this article:

I must admit, even with all of the advances in technology, I feel not one whit more secure on air travel. In point of fact, the U.S. TSA has made me feel much LESS secure, a feeling, I suspect, many in the UK share. Nor, with open borders in BOTH our countries, will we really ever STOP terrorists. So we allow these incursions into our privacy and our freedoms, all for naught. Our Benjamin Franklin once said that he who will trade essential liberty for security deserves NEITHER liberty nor security. I fear he was exactly correct.

1 posted on 10/15/2008 10:22:20 PM PDT by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

Wouldn’t it be better just to kick the holy sh!t out of terrorists?


2 posted on 10/15/2008 10:23:14 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

Ping


3 posted on 10/15/2008 10:23:43 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Yep. You got MY vote. Or introduce them to the wonderful and lovely Iron Maiden for a week or two in her embrace!


4 posted on 10/15/2008 10:25:28 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

Would you believe...?
5 posted on 10/15/2008 10:25:36 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Good job, Canada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

well with the new x ray, we can actually see it before we kick it.


6 posted on 10/15/2008 10:26:16 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Good job, Canada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

That does it, I’m buying that extension thingy before I fly again!


7 posted on 10/15/2008 10:26:50 PM PDT by papasmurf (I ain't your Daddy's Conservative, OK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

I see these articles on these scanners and I just don’t get it. The density of human flesh causes a particular color to appear on the monitor. Why doesn’t the digital processing of the image just make the flesh the same color as background, so the image looks like the invisible man and just shows the stuff ATTACHED to the body, and not the body itself ?


8 posted on 10/15/2008 10:27:35 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (I used to be Dilbert. Then I was Wally. I retired before I became the Pointy Haired One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

“But to spare their blushes, the faces of passengers will be blurred.”

What’s the point? Won’t the operators be able to see the passengers’ faces before and after they’re scanned?


9 posted on 10/15/2008 10:29:46 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
"But to spare their blushes, the faces of passengers will be blurred." Sure, that will do it. Image and video hosting by TinyPic
10 posted on 10/15/2008 10:30:08 PM PDT by ansel12 (America's favorite baby boomer, Sarah Barracuda. Hell, she's a natural-born world-shaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

Everybody should just show up at the airport naked.


11 posted on 10/15/2008 10:31:00 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby (I'm disinclined to acquiesce to your request.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
This is just horrible......So...how much does TSA pay screeners and are they hiring?
12 posted on 10/15/2008 10:31:36 PM PDT by txroadkill (Do it for Sarah!- Conservatism= finding joy in duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

I imagine (hope) the operator would be in a separate room with a red button to bang on when there’s a problem.


13 posted on 10/15/2008 10:32:17 PM PDT by TheZMan (barack HUSSEIN obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

On the positive side this might give a boost to private aviation and eventually pump up small aircraft sales.


14 posted on 10/15/2008 10:34:14 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Let me guess, Lifeguard, right?


15 posted on 10/15/2008 10:34:49 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Democracy, two wolves and one sheep deciding what's for dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

That and make everyone eat a ham sandwich in front of the screeners before being allowed on board...problem solved.


16 posted on 10/15/2008 10:37:17 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Reminds me of my 7th grade teacher whose blouse always had chalk on the front.


17 posted on 10/15/2008 10:37:30 PM PDT by ansel12 (America's favorite baby boomer, Sarah Barracuda. Hell, she's a natural-born world-shaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

That’s what the article says...


18 posted on 10/15/2008 10:39:47 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

Well Duh!


19 posted on 10/15/2008 10:40:29 PM PDT by Cold Heat (Well....................................That's .....that.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

20 posted on 10/15/2008 10:44:37 PM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson