Krauthammer is against ebryonic stem cell research... did you know that?
Not the last time I heard him - he wasn’t.
Don’t bother with that kiddiot. That’s what FR is headed to be populated with.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer#IdeologyKrauthammer is generally considered a conservative.[20] However, on domestic issues, Krauthammer is a supporter of legalized abortion; an opponent of the death penalty; an intelligent design critic and an advocate for the scientific consensus on evolution, calling the religion-science controversy a "false conflict;" a supporter of embryonic stem cell research (involving embryos discarded by fertility clinics); and a longtime advocate of radically higher energy taxes to induce conservation. Meg Greenfield, editorial page editor for The Washington Post who edited Krauthammer's columns for 15 years, called his weekly column "independent and hard to peg politically. It's a very tough column. There's no 'trendy' in it. You never know what is going to happen next."
According to Wikipedia he's pro-abortion and pro-embryonic stem-cell research. He believes that embryos at fertility clinics should be used, and he believes federal money should fund it. Wikipedia has footnoted articles on his positions.