Posted on 10/15/2008 1:02:01 PM PDT by mojito
Oh, come on, Michelle couldn’t have really said that—it must be a hoax! ;-)
Republicans need to name it the Obama “Spread the Wealth” Economic Plan and not let up. Everytime his plan is mentioned, that phrase needs to be put in there very emphatically. Don’t let it out of anyone’s mind before the election. Please need to be walking into the voting booth with that playing over and over in their heads. THAT’S what will resonate.
With just matter-of-fact words, Joe proves he’s far more an American than The One. But then, common sense always trumps bloviating socialism, except in democrat sycophant minds. Joe makes too much sense for most democrat voters to get it.
use the following link to listen to the audio.
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjljYjA3YTYzMjU2ZjA5Yzg1MmM2YjIzZjEyN2ZjZjk=
Great post
I know, I was just joshing since there’s a question on whether she really made the statements reported by API!
Obowser??
Fantastic!!!!!
Senator Obama, We look at your policies. Massive government programs. Wealth redistribution via tax policy. Large tax increases on producers to those that have not earned it. Government giveaways. Government run healthcare, mandated for all. A plan to give a trillion taxpayer dollars for global wealth redistribution. Senator Obama, you, who first ran for the Illinois Senate as a New Party - a socialist party group - why do you not call your vision for America, socialist - because it is? And how does socialism fit into a Constitutional Republic? They are two conflicting governmental philosophies. One thinks government needs to run and control everything. The other wants small government and private owners making the decisions how to run things.
Second: Sir, this country is about giving everyone the same equality of opportunity, it was NEVER set up to guarantee equality of OUTCOME. Yet all your policies are geared towards forcing equality of outcome. How is using the power of government to take assets and income from some and giving it to others, an American principle?
Third: Before we were a country, we tried socialism in America. It was called Jamestown. The experiment failed miserably with half the colonists dying the first winter. When people do unequal work but get the same reward, nobody works very hard because there’s no incentive to. When they changed this policy and let people keep what they grew, they had large crop surpluses and were able to pay their debts off quicker. Yet all of your policies are about punishing people who you think have too much, and giving it to others you believe should have it. How is that the American Dream - “Don’t be too successful, else we will take it from you?” Who are you to decide has too much?
4. Senator Obama. Right now, if someone comes up to me on the street, and says, “You make too much money, and I don’t have enough. You need to pay me $200 a month. Hand it over.” We’d say the person is nuts and has no moral or legal claim to my earnings. Yet you, Senator Obama, with the full power and strength of the federal government, wants to do the same thing, you want to be the middleman who takes it from me, and holds it a little while, then gives it to the other guy. Now, explain to me how that really is an American way of doing things, as you say, Senator Obama, rather than a socialist way of doing things?
silly me, I didn’t look close enough at your post with the ‘wink’ at the end. sorry. :o)
I'm reasonably certain that Barack won't be all that happy with what he gets from some of us...
Remember the old saying: "Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it."
L
BTTT
There was a time (Sixties) when the phrase “share the wealth” equated to “socialism” in the mind of the average American. And, in that same mind, socialism was a bad thing. I just get the feeling these days that the sinew that once held these ideas together just doesn’t exist anymore.
That memories are too short to connect “share the wealth” to socialism is not surprising. What is a little surprising to me is the number of people in this country who are ready and even eager to adopt socialism, in all or in part, as our economic model.
That’s the only bad consequence of the fall of communism in the USSR. We don’t have the spector of the Soviet Union hanging over us to remind us to stay diligent.
This is why McCain picked Sarah Palin. To appeal to voters like this guy — and there are tens of millions of them.
bump for “Tell ‘em like it is” Joe.
The complete interview is excellent!!!
Get off your butt and go work. Don’t sit there and expect the government to give it to you.
My thoughts exactly!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.