Intent is an unmeasurable quality...thats what it boils down to. If you have people who have lived in the state for 30 days, and claim it is their intent to live there after the election, they are eligible to vote. Intent is also subject to reality, and if they “intend” to stay but really end up leaving then there is no legal basis for claiming that they did anything other than take advantage of the system.
Sometimes, but not always, and not entirely. A student who intends to stay in that state could obtain a drivers license; or if working part time, file income tax returns in that state, etc.
Anyway, I agree the system is easily gamed, especially when the evidentiary standards for establishing "residency" are set as low as they presently are. Dishonest students will vote in two states - maybe even more than once in the state they are hanging out in during the election season.
>>Intent is an unmeasurable quality<<
Daniel Hemel, one of the Obama punks at the house in question, was enrolled in school at Oxford, but then camped out and voted in Ohio, and then went back to Oxford.
Since they are not going to extradite him from England, he won’t have to explain this, but I’m not buying it. He had no intention of being a resident of Ohio in any sense of the word. Did not register nor vote in good faith.
Vote fraud, and possibly a conspiracy with other members of “Vote from Home.”