Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Imposing San Francisco Values On First-Graders
Townhall.com ^ | October 15, 2008 | Maggie Gallagher

Posted on 10/15/2008 4:28:47 AM PDT by Kaslin

Thank God for San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom.

If, when the dust settles at the ballot box this Nov. 4, California voters definitively repudiate the California Supreme Court's unjust gay marriage ruling by voting Yes on Proposition 8, Mayor Gavin Newsom will be a big part of the reason why.

Even the San Francisco Chronicle acknowledged on Monday that in recent weeks, Mayor Newsom's role in the gay marriage debate "has turned decidedly unheroic."

"He's become everyone's worst nightmare," said Barbara O'Connor, a professor of political communications at Sacramento State University

Gay marriage is coming "whether you like it or not," Mayor Newsom intones in news clips featured in the first round of Yes-on-Proposition-8 ads, looking unbearably smug and arrogant in dictating the future of marriage for the rest of California from his San Francisco perch. (See the ads for yourself at www.protectmarriage.com.)

Public opinion polls showed a dramatic surge in support for Prop 8 after these Yes-on-Propostion-8 ads featuring Newsom hit the airwaves. Faced with a dramatic drop in public support once the real potential consequences of gay marriage for parents, public schools, church groups and others are highlighted, gay marriage advocates have responded with a rebuttal ad. (See it at www.noonprop8.com.)

Their allegedly pro-gay marriage message? Labeling the concerns that public schools will teach about gay marriage, if we permit gay marriage to remain the law of the land, as just "lies!"

Right. What do gay marriage advocates think public schools should teach about marriage if gay marriage is the law of the land? Could we have a reasonably honest discussion please about what you have in store for California's first-graders?

Instead of standing their ground and defending their moral views, gay marriage advocates are simply pretending to voters that legalizing gay marriage won't affect anyone else at all.

Marriage is a publicly affirmed status -- a shared social ideal -- not just a private act. When the government says gay unions are the ideal -- exactly the same as husband and wife -- a whole lot of people who disagree are going to find life gets a whole lot harder, especially when it comes to raising our children.

So what does Mayor Newsom, the poster boy for arrogance among gay marriage advocates, do in the middle of this campaign to deceive California voters about the real consequences of gay marriage?

Why, he presides over a lesbian teacher's wedding ceremony at City Hall, to which public school children are bused, at taxpayer expense, during school hours. (Newsom claims he wasn't aware of that fact when he agreed to preside.)

That's right. Taxpayers paid for first-graders to take time from reading, writing and 'rithmetic to strew rose petals after a lesbian marriage ceremony -- no doubt in the belief that there was something educational about witnessing a historic civil rights victory the courts have endorsed as the law of the land.

Let me be clear about one thing: I know many, many gay people who have no truck with the arrogance of so many leaders of the gay marriage movement in California (see for example www.gaypatriot.net). I even know some gay people (though, not very many) who think marriage means a husband and wife, and that the California solution struck down by the courts -- civil unions for gay couples, marriage remains marriage -- is common sense, not some kind of gross injustice motivated by seething hatred to gay folks.

If Prop 8 loses, expect a lot more public schools to join Mayor Newsom's crusade to promote gay marriage, "whether you like it or not."

People who think that's a good thing should have the decency to stand up before California voters and say so, instead of pretending it's not going to happen.

It already has.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2008; homosexualagenda; maggiegallagher; prop8; samesexmarriage

1 posted on 10/15/2008 4:28:47 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Prop 8 will pass,then the homos will find a court to rule it unconstitutional.


2 posted on 10/15/2008 4:31:52 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Homosexual perverts used to hang around public toilets.

Now they run our public schools.


3 posted on 10/15/2008 4:48:34 AM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“Gay marriage is coming “whether you like it or not,” Mayor Newsom intones in news clips featured in the first round of Yes-on-Proposition-8 ads, looking unbearably smug and arrogant in dictating the future of marriage for the rest of California from his San Francisco perch.”

Homonazi.

4 posted on 10/15/2008 4:59:55 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (If Hillary is elected, her legacy will be telling the American people: Better put some ice on that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

But we should put all that aside and let them take our boy scout troops camping for the weekend.

Over my bloody bat.


5 posted on 10/15/2008 5:03:12 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (If Hillary is elected, her legacy will be telling the American people: Better put some ice on that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

“Homosexual perverts used to hang around public toilets.”

When I attended Harvard in the early 1990s, male homosexuals sodomized each other in the bathroom of the Science Center. Thanks to them, door were removed on the stalls, so everyone got to lose their privacy!


6 posted on 10/15/2008 5:22:00 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Police are chasing off birders from sections of a nearby lake after complaints that gays were romping around nude and having sex.
The police’s solution? chase the ‘good guys’ off and let the gays take over.
Seems they are unable to control the area for whatever reason.

I’ll bet if the offenders were straight the police would have a whole different attitude.


7 posted on 10/15/2008 5:34:26 AM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The point is the opponents of Proposition 8 cannot make a positive case for same sex marriage. They cannot show any positive benefit it has - whether for marital stability, raising children and reinforcing shared values between a couple. All they can do is lie, smear and deceive the voters. On the other hand, the case FOR traditional marriage is so evident to people that amending the California constitution to protect it is quite natural. The benefits in terms of marital happiness, stable families, reduced crime and moral habits are so overwhelming that no relationship in history has created it as well as one between a man and a woman joined together for life. Do the opponents of Proposition 8 have a rebuttal to present here? And how do intact families with a father and a mother harm gays and lesbians? There's no discrimination here at all.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

8 posted on 10/15/2008 10:10:31 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson