I spent time looking into the Wooten thing, so I don't think I've gone into the discussion without knowledge. Certainly I looked into it before writing articles making reference to the facts. What I found was a gossip mill with people grasping at straws and spinning. The "evidence" is that there was some kind of battle going on within the family and later that Gov. Palin didn't want the family problem encroaching on her political life. The he-said-she-saids go back and forth for a while - offering anyone who wants to take sides and opportunity - but without Sarah Palin being much in the middle of it - and it eventually settles down. Wooten was not fired and he has joint custody.
There's personal drama there but nothing that opens up a solution to the political destruction of marriage and family.
There's personal drama there but nothing that opens up a solution to the political destruction of marriage and family. Never said it did. That's another strawman argument on your part.
My point, one you haven't been able to refute, is that when Palin has already demonstrated her anti-man leanings just by her actions in her private life (more telling than what a candidate says in public), then there's NO likelihood of her being helpful to men, father's and family in the future. What isn't helpful, is harmful by default.
No one's been talking about marriage in *this* context--you're trying to move the goal posts here again in your effort to obfuscate what I am talking about.