Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RogerFGay
Our disagreement was over the Wooten thing - I don't think it's important.

*Nobody* can have it both ways. You cannot lecture on the need for men to vote for better candidates on men's issues and family issues and *at the same time* be a cheerleader for a candidate who personally uses family court as a weapon against *any* man. You are losing credibility every time you insist you can have it both ways.

199 posted on 10/14/2008 1:33:01 PM PDT by An American In Dairyland (BTW, I am a woman :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: An American In Dairyland
*Nobody* can have it both ways. You cannot lecture on the need for men to vote for better candidates on men's issues and family issues and *at the same time* be a cheerleader for a candidate who personally uses family court as a weapon against *any* man. You are losing credibility every time you insist you can have it both ways.

But it's not right for anyone to be the subject of false accusations - don't you agree? That fundamental principle is one worth fighting for.
204 posted on 10/14/2008 1:46:59 PM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson