To: RogerFGay
Our disagreement was over the Wooten thing - I don't think it's important. *Nobody* can have it both ways. You cannot lecture on the need for men to vote for better candidates on men's issues and family issues and *at the same time* be a cheerleader for a candidate who personally uses family court as a weapon against *any* man. You are losing credibility every time you insist you can have it both ways.
To: An American In Dairyland
*Nobody* can have it both ways. You cannot lecture on the need for men to vote for better candidates on men's issues and family issues and *at the same time* be a cheerleader for a candidate who personally uses family court as a weapon against *any* man. You are losing credibility every time you insist you can have it both ways.
But it's not right for anyone to be the subject of false accusations - don't you agree? That fundamental principle is one worth fighting for.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson