Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meadsjn; steve8714

Constitutionally, marriage and family issues belong to the states and to the people. The federal government is not allowed to regulate. 100% reduction in funding that supports family law reform is 100% appropriate and easy to do - with only benefits for taxpayers and society as a result. There is absolutely no downside except for those people who are part of the theft machine. By removing the federal government from family law regulation, and its pork-barrel funding, we would also be shutting down a significant organized criminal operation.


109 posted on 10/14/2008 7:59:15 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: RogerFGay
Constitutionally, marriage and family issues belong to the states and to the people. The federal government is not allowed to regulate. 100% reduction in funding that supports family law reform is 100% appropriate and easy to do

If it were easy to do, MRA's and FRA's would have accomplished it already. In fact, it is NOT easy to do. It hinges almost entirely on getting the RIGHT KIND of politicians into office. Electing people to high offices who you *already* know don't believe men have rights WRT children and who have a personal track record of acting on that belief will NEVER get these laws rescinded.

113 posted on 10/14/2008 8:05:24 AM PDT by An American In Dairyland (BTW, I am a woman :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson