Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rvoitier
And from what I've heard that law was not being enforced.

That's why I'd like to see the rules changed so the buyer can demand compliance. If the stock goes up after the short-seller has sold it, and the seller can't prove when he got it, the buyer gets the stock at the cheapest price the seller could have obtained it. If the stock goes down and the buyer no longer wants it, the seller has to see what he can do with the shares he finally acquired but didn't sell.

I would think letting market participants enforce the rules when they have an incentive to do so would be better than leaving enforcement in the hands of an agency with little such incentive.

15 posted on 10/13/2008 6:13:29 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
Here is a clip from Bloomberg on the problem which is the Fail-To-Deliver rate.

Ah, HERE it is. The report I saw that's the genesis of my question. 25min.

17 posted on 10/13/2008 7:14:58 PM PDT by rvoitier (Democrat--gateway ideology to Communism / It's the Revolution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson