Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

A clear conservative choice was what we needed.

An “anchor on the right” were the words I used.


9 posted on 10/13/2008 3:54:04 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Paying taxes for bank bailouts is apparently the patriotic thing to do. [/sarc])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

And one who took on his own party.....not buy trampling on the 1st and 2nd amendments, fighting Bush’s resistance to global warming legislation, and decrying the “tax cuts for the rich” either.

Rather, we needed the guy who calls a spade a spade, rejects political correctness, never panders to the left wing loonies, led the charge to kill off the Amnesty plans, and who refuses to kowtow to the communists in Beijing. One who fought tooth and nail against the “Kennedy wing of the Republican party” every moment of his career. And one who actually believes Reagan conservatism is the key to victory, not Brooks ‘conservatism’.


26 posted on 10/13/2008 4:07:47 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson